The Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench referred the matrimonial dispute between the parties to mediation for amicable settlement and directed the husband to deposit Rs. 20,000 before the Senior Registrar. The Court also granted interim protection by directing that no coercive steps shall be taken against the applicants during mediation proceedings.
Download Full Judgment PDFThe Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench dismissed the application of the husband seeking quashing of criminal proceedings in a dowry harassment case. However, considering the age and allegations against the parents-in-law, the Court granted interim protection to applicant nos. 2 and 3 and stayed proceedings against them till the next date of listing.
Download Full Judgment PDFThe Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench issued notice to the respondents and permitted the petitioner to serve dasti notice within 48 hours. The matter was directed to be listed on 29.04.2026 amongst the top ten cases.
Download Full Judgment PDFThe Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench set aside the GST order dated 27.04.2024 after observing that no opportunity of personal hearing was provided to the petitioner under Section 75(4) of the U.P. GST Act. The matter was remanded to the assessing authority for passing a fresh order after granting proper hearing.
Download Full Judgment PDFThe Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench granted permission to the petitioner to file a supplementary affidavit regarding knowledge of proceedings under Sections 61 and 73 of the UPGST Act and recovery orders. The matter was directed to be listed on 15.01.2026 for further hearing.
Download Full Judgment PDFThe Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench set aside the GST assessment order and recovery notice after observing that no opportunity of personal hearing was granted to the petitioner as required under Section 75(4) of the U.P. GST Act, 2017. The matter was remanded to the assessing authority for fresh proceedings.
Download Full Judgment PDFThe Debts Recovery Tribunal, Lucknow observed that any action taken by the respondent financial institution regarding the proposed e-auction shall remain subject to the final outcome of the SA. The matter was listed for further proceedings on 20.10.2026 by Presiding Officer Pravas Kumar Singh.
Download Full Judgment PDFThe Debts Recovery Tribunal, Lucknow directed the respondent financial institution to issue a fresh 15-day notice before taking possession under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act. The matter was listed for further proceedings on 19.08.2026 by Presiding Officer Pravas Kumar Singh.
Download Full Judgment PDFThe Debts Recovery Tribunal, Lucknow disposed of the urgency application after recording the respondent financial institution’s statement that no notice for physical possession had been issued. The Tribunal directed that a fresh 15-day notice must be served before taking physical possession of the secured assets. The matter was listed for further hearing on 16.04.2026 by Presiding Officer Pravas Kumar Singh.
Download Full Judgment PDFThe Debts Recovery Tribunal, Lucknow directed that any action taken by the respondent bank regarding the proposed e-auction shall remain subject to the final outcome of the SA. The matter was adjourned for final hearing on 22.09.2026 by Presiding Officer Pravas Kumar Singh.
Download Full Judgment PDFThe Debts Recovery Tribunal, Lucknow heard applications seeking early hearing and permission for settlement through an OTS proposal. The applicant expressed willingness to deposit 25% of the outstanding amount and submit a suitable OTS proposal. The Tribunal directed the applicant to approach the respondent financial institution for settlement and observed that if the amount is deposited and the OTS proposal is submitted, the respondent bank shall not proceed with taking physical possession of the secured assets. The matter was listed for further proceedings on 12.11.2026 by Presiding Officer Pravas Kumar Singh.
Download Full Judgment PDFThe Debts Recovery Tribunal, Lucknow heard applications seeking urgent relief to restrain the respondent bank from proceeding with e-auction of the property. The respondent bank informed the Tribunal that no bid had been received in the auction, due to which the interim applications stood disposed of. The matter was adjourned to 17.07.2026 by Presiding Officer Pravas Kumar Singh.
Download Full Judgment PDFThe Debts Recovery Tribunal, Lucknow directed the applicant to file a reply to the bank’s objections and take fresh steps against the auction purchaser. The matter was adjourned to 18.03.2026 by Presiding Officer Pravas Kumar Singh.
Download Full Judgment PDFThe Debts Recovery Tribunal, Lucknow heard S.A. No. 606/2025 on 18.06.2025. Counsel for the applicant pointed out irregularities in the sale notice dated 02.06.2025 under which the auction was fixed for 19.06.2025. Counsel for the respondent bank informed the Tribunal that the sale notice dated 02.06.2025 had been withdrawn, making the issue infructuous. The Tribunal adjourned the matter for further hearing on 07.01.2026 and granted liberty to the applicant to move an urgency application if required. The order was dictated by Presiding Officer Pravas Kumar Singh.
Download Full Judgment PDFThe Debts Recovery Tribunal, Lucknow heard S.A. No. 95/2025 on 06.08.2025. Counsel for the applicant pressed applications seeking urgent listing and interim relief to restrain the respondent bank from taking possession of the secured asset. The respondent bank informed the Tribunal that the applicant had not complied with the earlier order dated 07.02.2025 regarding deposit of 25% of the stipulated amount. The applicant submitted that due to family urgency, compliance could not be made and sought time to deposit Rs. 3 lakhs and submit an OTS proposal. The Tribunal directed the applicant to deposit Rs. 3 lakhs within 15 days and submit an OTS proposal, failing which the respondent bank would be free to proceed in accordance with law. The matter was adjourned to 16.03.2026 by Presiding Officer Pravas Kumar Singh.
Download Full Judgment PDFThe Debts Recovery Tribunal, Lucknow heard S.A. No. 806/2025 on 29.08.2025. Counsel for both parties appeared before the Tribunal. The respondent bank informed the Tribunal that no bid had been received, due to which the urgency prayer became infructuous. Considering the heavy pendency of cases, the matter was adjourned to 30.04.2026 with liberty granted to the parties to file an urgency application if required. The order was dictated by Presiding Officer Pravas Kumar Singh.
Download Full Judgment PDFThe Debts Recovery Tribunal, Lucknow heard the matter through virtual mode in SA No. 461/26 between Mrs. Savitri Devi and Hinduja Housing Finance Ltd. Counsel for both parties appeared before the Tribunal. The Tribunal recorded that no bid had been received and listed the matter for completion of pleadings before the Registrar on 07.08.2026. The order was dictated by Presiding Officer Vimal Gupta.
Download Full Judgment PDFIn S.A. No. 806/2025 before the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Lucknow, the counsel for the respondent bank informed the Tribunal that no bid had been received in the matter. Consequently, the urgency prayer was held to have become infructuous. Due to heavy pendency and administrative constraints, the matter was adjourned to 30.04.2026. The Tribunal also granted liberty to the parties to file an urgency application if required in future. The order was directed to be uploaded on the Tribunal’s official website.
Download Full Judgment PDFPlanetLex Law Firm represented the petitioner before the Hon’ble High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench in Writ Tax No. 1750 of 2025 titled M/S R.S. Communication vs State of U.P. & Others.
Download Full Judgment PDFLegal awareness regarding matrimonial disputes, restitution of conjugal rights, child custody, divorce proceedings, and related family law remedies.
Download Full Judgment PDFLegal position regarding Section 13B, mutual consent divorce, waiver of cooling period, and Supreme Court guidelines.
Download Full Judgment PDFRepresentation in matrimonial transfer proceedings, guardianship disputes, and family court related litigation matters.
Download Full Judgment PDFRepresentation in RERA disputes, recall applications, housing authority matters, and real estate litigation before the High Court.
Download Full Judgment PDFRepresentation in criminal writ petitions, FIR related disputes, matrimonial criminal matters, and mediation proceedings before the High Court.
Download Full Judgment PDFLegal representation in loan recovery disputes, SARFAESI proceedings, auction stay matters, and banking litigation before DRT.
Download Full Judgment PDFImportant legal questions involving RERA Act, allottee rights, delayed possession, and interest liability after possession
Download Full Judgment PDF